ReviewEuropean journal of radiology open2024
Advancing radiology with GPT-4: Innovations in clinical applications, patient engagement, research, and learning.
Review in European journal of radiology open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Medical machine learning operations: a framework to facilitate clinical AI development and deployment in radiology.European radiology · 2025Review
- Leveraging artificial intelligence in the peer review of neurosurgical research articles.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
- Chatbots in Radiology: Current Applications, Limitations and Future Directions of ChatGPT in Medical Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Deep learning model for diagnosis of thyroid nodules with size less than 1 cm: A multicenter, retrospective study.European journal of radiology open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare, particularly in radiology, underscores a transformative era marked by a potential for enhanced diagnostic precision, increased patient engagement, and streamlined clinical workflows. Amongst the key developments at the heart of this transformation are Large Language Models like the Generative Pre-trained Transformer 4 (GPT-4), whose integration into radiological practices could potentially herald a significant leap by assisting in the generation and summarization of radiology reports, aiding in differential diagnoses, and recommending evidence-based treatments. This review delves into the multifaceted potential applications of Large Language Models within radiology, using GPT-4 as an example, from improving diagnostic accuracy and reporting efficiency to translating complex medical findings into patient-friendly summaries. The review acknowledges the ethical, privacy, and technical challenges inherent in deploying AI technologies, emphasizing the importance of careful oversight, validation, and adherence to regulatory standards. Through a balanced discourse on the potential and pitfalls of GPT-4 in radiology, the article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of how these models have the potential to reshape the future of radiological services, fostering improvements in patient care, educational methodologies, and clinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.