Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39170703›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2024

The application of rhubarb concoctions in traditional Chinese medicine and its compounds, processing methods, pharmacology, toxicology and clinical research.

Yi Wen, Pei-Jia Yan, Pei-Xuan Fan, Shan-Shan Lu, Mao-Ya Li, Xian-Yun Fu, Shao-Bin Wei

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Anthraquinones fromDrug design, development and therapy · 2025
    Review
  11. Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yi Wen *Gynecology Department, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Pei-Jia Yan *Gynecology Department, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Pei-Xuan FanGynecology Department, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Shan-Shan LuGynecology Department, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Mao-Ya LiGynecology Department, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Xian-Yun FuCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, China.
Shao-Bin WeiGynecology Department, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study reviews the development of rhubarb processing and the current status of pharmacological research. We summarized the effects of different processing methods on the active compounds, pharmacological effects, and toxicity of rhubarb, as well as the clinical application of different concoctions, providing reference for further pharmacological research and clinical application of rhubarb. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using databases such as Pubmed, Embase, National Science and Technology Library, Web of science, CNKI, China Science and Technology Journal Database, SinoMed, and the Results: Historical records of rhubarb processing date back to the Han Dynasty, with continual innovations. Currently, the types of rhubarb used in traditional Chinese medicine have stabilized to three species: Conclusion: Different processing methods alter the active compounds of rhubarb, thereby enhancing its various pharmacological effects and meeting the therapeutic needs of diverse diseases. Selecting an appropriate processing method based on the patient's specific conditions can maximize its pharmacological properties and improve clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

clinical applicationscompoundspharmacologyprocessingrhubarb

Identifiers

PMID39170703
PMCPMC11335691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.