ArticleFrontiers in genetics2024
Construction of a prognostic model via WGCNA combined with the LASSO algorithm for stomach adenocarcinoma patients.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A seven-gene diagnostic and prognostic signature for papillary thyroid carcinoma.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Integrative analysis of transcriptomics and drug-target networks identifies SMN1 as a novel biomarker and therapeutic target for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Single-cell expression and immune infiltration analysis of polyamine metabolism in breast cancer.Discover oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to identify prognostic signatures to predict the prognosis of patients with stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD), which is necessary to improve poor prognosis and offer possible treatment strategies for STAD patients. Methods: The overlapping genes between the key model genes that were screened by the weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) whose expression was different with significance between normal and tumor tissues were extracted to serve as co-expression genes. Then, enrichment analysis was performed on these genes. Furthermore, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was performed to screen the hub genes among overlapping genes. Finally, we constructed a model to explore the influence of polygenic risk scores on the survival probability of patients with STAD, and interaction effect and mediating analyses were also performed. Results: DEGs included 2,899 upregulated genes and 2,896 downregulated genes. After crossing the DEGs and light-yellow module genes that were obtained by WGCNA, a total of 39 overlapping genes were extracted. The gene enrichment analysis revealed that these genes were enriched in the prion diseases, biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids, RNA metabolic process, hydrolase activity, etc. PIP5K1P1, PTTG3P, and SNORD15B were determined by LASSO-Cox. The prognostic prediction of the three-gene model was established. The Cox regression analysis showed that the comprehensive risk score for three genes was an independent prognosis factor. Conclusion: PIP5K1P1, PTTG3P, and SNORD15B are related to the prognosis and overall survival of patients. The three-gene risk model constructed has independent prognosis predictive ability for STAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.