ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2024
Risk of Nerve Injury Following Peroneus Longus Harvest is Very Low: A Prospective Cohort of 600 Patients.
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Harvesting the Peroneus Longus Does Not Lead to Peroneal Brevis Hypertrophy: Prospective Ultrasound-Based Study of 40 Patients.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Peroneus longus (PL) graft harvest has gained popularity in recent years for a variety of ligament surgeries. One of the common apprehensions regarding its more widespread usage has been the risk of injury to the common peroneal nerve or the sural nerve during graft harvest. The purpose of the current study is to assess the rate of injury to the peroneal and sural nerve following PL harvest using our technique in a large cohort of patients. Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort of 600 consecutive patients undergoing PLG harvest over a period from January 2022 to December 2022 at a single tertiary referral centre were included for analysis. Patients had baseline screening of nerve function prior to surgery and were regularly followed up at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months post-harvest. Grouped variables for the sural and peroneal nerve were completed and analysis was carried out using Cochrane's Results: We found that only 0.01% of patients had any nerve complications at 6 months follow-up, and three times more patients had sural nerve complaints than peroneal nerve complaints at the end of the 6 months follow-up. Conclusion: Peroneus longus harvest is a safe and reproducible technique with low complication rate. The rate of nerve complications post-harvest is grossly overestimated in the literature secondary to low-powered and low evidence studies. We believe that using our safe surgical technique for PL harvest with respect to surface landmarks allows for PL harvest with a low nerve complication rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.