Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39170659›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2024

Risk of Nerve Injury Following Peroneus Longus Harvest is Very Low: A Prospective Cohort of 600 Patients.

Manit Arora, Tapish Shukla, Mohit Singla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Manit AroraDepartment of Orthopaedics, Fortis Hospital, Sector-62, Phase-VIII, Mohali, Punjab 160062 India.
Tapish ShuklaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Fortis Hospital, Sector-62, Phase-VIII, Mohali, Punjab 160062 India.
Mohit SinglaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Fortis Hospital, Sector-62, Phase-VIII, Mohali, Punjab 160062 India.ORCID 0000-0002-0750-5568

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Peroneus longus (PL) graft harvest has gained popularity in recent years for a variety of ligament surgeries. One of the common apprehensions regarding its more widespread usage has been the risk of injury to the common peroneal nerve or the sural nerve during graft harvest. The purpose of the current study is to assess the rate of injury to the peroneal and sural nerve following PL harvest using our technique in a large cohort of patients. Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort of 600 consecutive patients undergoing PLG harvest over a period from January 2022 to December 2022 at a single tertiary referral centre were included for analysis. Patients had baseline screening of nerve function prior to surgery and were regularly followed up at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months post-harvest. Grouped variables for the sural and peroneal nerve were completed and analysis was carried out using Cochrane's Results: We found that only 0.01% of patients had any nerve complications at 6 months follow-up, and three times more patients had sural nerve complaints than peroneal nerve complaints at the end of the 6 months follow-up. Conclusion: Peroneus longus harvest is a safe and reproducible technique with low complication rate. The rate of nerve complications post-harvest is grossly overestimated in the literature secondary to low-powered and low evidence studies. We believe that using our safe surgical technique for PL harvest with respect to surface landmarks allows for PL harvest with a low nerve complication rate.

Indexed as

Ligament surgeriesNerve injuryPeroneal nervePeroneus longus graftSural nerve

Identifiers

PMID39170659
PMCPMC11333653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.