ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2024
The decoder design and performance comparative analysis for closed-loop brain-machine interface system.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A hierarchical Bayesian inference model for volatile multivariate exponentially distributed signals.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain-machine interface (BMI) can convert electroencephalography signals (EEGs) into the control instructions of external devices, and the key of control performance is the accuracy and efficiency of decoder. However, the performance of different decoders obtaining control instructions from complex and variable EEG signals is very different and irregular in the different neural information transfer model. Aiming at this problem, the off-line and on-line performance of eight decoders based on the improved single-joint information transmission (SJIT) model is compared and analyzed in this paper, which can provide a theoretical guidance for decoder design. Firstly, in order to avoid the different types of neural activities in the decoding process on the decoder performance, eight decoders based on the improved SJIT model are designed. And then the off-line decoding performance of these decoders is tested and compared. Secondly, a closed-loop BMI system which combining by the designed decoder and the random forest encoder based on the improved SJIT model is constructed. Finally, based on the constructed closed-loop BMI system, the on-line decoding performance of decoders is compared and analyzed. The results show that the LSTM-based decoder has better on-line decoding performance than others in the improved SJIT model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.