Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39170590›Full record

ArticleCanada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada

Social capital interventions for human papillomavirus (HPV) immunization and cervical cancer screening: A rapid review.

Christina Gillies, Lisa K Allen-Scott, Candace I J Nykiforuk, Ana Paula Belon, Minji Olivia Kim, Bernice Lee, Laura Nieuwendyk, Kamala Adhikari, Elaine M Ori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christina GilliesProvincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB.
Lisa K Allen-ScottProvincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB.
Candace I J NykiforukSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB.
Ana Paula BelonCentre for Healthy Communities, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB.
Minji Olivia KimCentre for Healthy Communities, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB.
Bernice LeeCentre for Healthy Communities, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB.
Laura NieuwendykCentre for Healthy Communities, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB.
Kamala AdhikariProvincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB.
Elaine M OriProvincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Social capital can be used as a conceptual framework to include social context as a predictor of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination and cervical cancer screening behaviours. However, the effectiveness of interventions that use social capital as a mechanism to improve uptake of immunization and screening remains elusive. Objective: To synthesize empirical evidence on the impact of social capital interventions on HPV immunization and cervical cancer screening and describe key characteristics of such interventions. Methods: Using a rapid review methodology, a search of literature published between 2012 and 2022 was conducted in four databases. Two researchers assessed the studies according to inclusion criteria in a three-step screening process. Studies were assessed for quality and data concerning social capital and equity components and intervention impact were extracted and analyzed using narrative synthesis. Results: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies found improved knowledge, beliefs and intentions regarding HPV immunization and cervical cancer screening. None of the studies improved uptake of immunization; however, three studies found post-intervention improvements in uptake of cervical cancer screening. All studies either tailored their interventions to meet the needs of specific groups or described results for specific disadvantaged groups. Conclusion: Limited evidence suggests that interventions that consider and reflect local context through social capital may be more likely to increase the uptake of HPV immunization and cervical cancer screening. However, further research must be done to bridge the gap in translating improvements in knowledge and intention into HPV immunization and cervical cancer screening behaviours.

Indexed as

cancer screeningcervical cancerhealth equityHPV vaccinationpublic healthsocial capitalsocial support

Identifiers

PMID39170590
PMCPMC11321452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.