ArticleHeliyon2024
Construction of a mitophagy-related prognostic signature for predicting prognosis and tumor microenvironment in lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- TOMM40/FADS2 Expression Ratio Predicts the Sensitivity to mTOR Inhibitors in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Mitophagy-driven multidimensional regulation of tumor immune evasion and context-dependent therapeutic strategies.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Combined single-cell transcriptome and Mendelian randomization to identify and validate prognostic genes associated with endoplasmic reticulum stress and butyrate metabolism in lung adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Mitophagy related gene signature for prognosis and therapeutic evaluation in KIRC.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Targeting NLRC4 for potential therapeutic strategies in lung adenocarcinoma.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Mitochondrial autophagy-related lncRNAs as prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets in gastric adenocarcinoma.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mitophagy is the selective degradation of mitochondria by autophagy. It becomes increasingly clear that mitophagy pathways are important for cancer cells to adapt to their high-energy needs. However, which genes associated with mitophagy could be used to prognosis cancer is unknown. Methods: We created a clinical prognostic model using mitophagy-related genes (MRGs) in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients for the first time, and we employed bioinformatics methods to search for biomarkers that affect the progression and prognosis of LUAD. Transcriptome data for LUAD were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, and additional expression data from LUAD patients were sourced from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Furthermore, 25 complete MRGs were identified based on annotations from the MSigDB database. Results: A comparison of the mitophagy scores between the groups with high and low scores was done using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, which also revealed the differential gene expression patterns between the two groups. Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, two prognostic MRGs from the groups with high and low mitophagy scores were identified: Conclusions: Our prognostic model would improve the prognosis of LUAD and guide clinical treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.