ArticleHeliyon2024
Application of eye and hand interventions in brain magnetic resonance imaging of young children.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the feasibility of eye and hand interventions in young children during brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: A total of 414 4- to 6-year-old children who underwent brain MRI at our hospital were randomly divided into 4 groups: the routine posture group (n = 105), eye mask group (n = 102), fixed hand apron group (n = 108), and eye mask and fixed hand apron group (n = 99). All the children underwent brain MRI when they were awake (without using sedatives). The success rate of brain MRI and the quality of brain MR images were compared among the four groups. Results: The success rate of brain MRI was the highest in the eye mask and fixed hand apron group (94.9 %), followed by the eye mask group (85.3 %) (P < 0.05). The brain MR image quality was the best for children wearing eye masks and fixed hand aprons (5 points, 69 patients), followed by those wearing eye masks (5 points, 53 patients) (P < 0.05). Conclusion: When children undergo brain MRI, simultaneous eye and hand interventions can greatly improve the success rate of the examination and the quality of MR images. This study protocol was registered at the Chinese clinical trial registry (ChiCTR2100050248).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.