Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39170566›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Validation of effect of composite additive on optimized combustion characteristics of CI engine using AHP and GRA method.

Amit R Patil, S A Patil, Rupali Patil, A M Pawar, V N Chougule, Kareem AboRas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amit R PatilDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, M. E. S. College of Engineering, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, MS, India.
S A PatilMechanical Engineering Department, PDEA's College of Engineering, Manjari, Bk, Pune, India.
Rupali PatilDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Pimpri Chinchwad College Of Engineering & Research, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, MS, India.
A M PawarBharati Vidyapeeth Women's College of Engineering, Maharashtra, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.
V N ChouguleDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, M. E. S. College of Engineering, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, MS, India.
Kareem AboRasFaculty of Engineering, Alexandria University, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary focus of this study is the validation of composite additives with the help of additional optimization methods and the analysis of its effect on the combustion characteristics of compression ignition (CI) engines. Previous work on the identification of the correct multi additive combination by Taguchi and the TOPSIS optimization method has shown substantial improvements in the performance and emission characteristics of CI engines. The same work was extended using the GRA Optimization method with the Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) optimization technique known as the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to validate the optimization results from the previous optimization work. Remarkably, all optimization methods yielded consistent results, pointing to the superiority of the composite additive sample 'D8EH6E4 hence supporting the outcome of previous work. Subsequent testing and comparison of this novel composite additive with baseline diesel fuel for combustion characteristics analysis demonstrated notable improvements in combustion parameters, including a 25 % reduction in the rate of pressure rise, an 18 % decrease in net heat release rate, and a 6 % decrease in mean gas temperature.

Indexed as

AHPCombustionDiesel engineFuel additivesMCDM

Identifiers

PMID39170566
PMCPMC11336324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.