Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39170484›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

A review of improvements on electric vehicle battery.

Alex K Koech, Gershom Mwandila, Francis Mulolani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alex K KoechChemical Engineering Department, School of Mines and Mineral Sciences, Copperbelt University, Zambia.
Gershom MwandilaChemical Engineering Department, School of Mines and Mineral Sciences, Copperbelt University, Zambia.
Francis MulolaniElectrical Engineering Department, School of Engineering, Copperbelt University, Zambia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of efficient and high-performance electric vehicle (EV) batteries relies on improving various components, such as the anode and cathode electrodes, separators, and electrolytes. This review paper offers an elaborate overview of different materials for these components, emphasizing their respective contributions to the improvement of EV battery performance. Carbon-based materials, metal composites, and polymer nanocomposites are explored for the anode, offering high energy density and capacity. However, they are noted to be susceptible to Li plating. Unique structures, such as Titanium niobium oxide (TiNb

Indexed as

Battery management systemsFast-charging lithium-ion batteriesLithium platingSolid electrolyte interphaseThermal management

Identifiers

PMID39170484
PMCPMC11336316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.