ArticleHeliyon2024
Lowered ratio of corticospinal excitation to inhibition predicts greater disability, poorer motor and cognitive function in multiple sclerosis.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gait instability is a more specific predictor of corticospinal tract function than gait speed in clinically stable multiple sclerosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Age-related differences in agility are related to both muscle strength and corticospinal tract function.Physiological reports · 2025Article
- Considering neurophysiological mechanisms of dual-tasking in people with multiple sclerosis: an exploratory, cross-sectional small-N study.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Investigate excitatory-inhibitory (E/I) (im)balance using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in individuals with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and determine its validity as a neurophysiological biomarker of disability. Methods: Participants with MS (n = 83) underwent TMS, cognitive, and motor function assessments. TMS-induced motor evoked potential amplitudes (excitability) and cortical silent periods (inhibition) were assessed bilaterally through recruitment curves. The E/I ratio was calculated as the ratio of excitation to inhibition. Results: Participants with greater disability (Expanded Disability Status Scale, EDSS≥3) exhibited lower excitability and increased inhibition compared to those with lower disability (EDSS<3). This resulted in lower E/I ratios in the higher disability group. Individuals with higher disability presented with asymmetrical E/I ratios between brain hemispheres, a pattern not present in the group with lower disability. In regression analyses controlling for demographics, lowered TMS-probed E/I ratio predicted variance in disability (R Conclusion: The E/I ratio is a potential neurophysiological biomarker of disability level in MS, especially when assessed in the hemisphere corresponding to the weaker body side. Interventions aimed at increasing cortical excitation or reducing inhibition may restore E/I balance potentially stalling progression or improving function in MS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.