ArticleHeliyon2024
Brain and muscles magnetic stimulation in a drug-free case of Parkinson's disease: Motor improvements concomitant to neuroplasticty.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Noninvasive stimulation of the nervous system is of growing interest in Parkinson's disease (PD) to slow-down motor decline and decrease medication and its side-effects. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) used in PD to modulate the excitability of the primary motor cortex (M1) provided controversial results, in part because of interactions with medication. This warrants to administer rTMS in drug-free patients. Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS of muscles) has not yet been tested in PD. Its influence on M1 plasticity (as tested by TMS, transcranial magnetic stimulation) and sensorimotor disorders in other health conditions makes it worth be explored in PD. Thus, rTMS and rPMS were tested in a drug-free woman (52 years old, PD-diagnosed 10 years ago) in four different rTMS + rPMS combinations (one week apart): sham-sham, real-real, real-sham, sham-real. rTMS was applied over M1 contralateral to the most impaired bodyside, and rPMS on muscles of the legs, trunk, and arms, bilaterally. M1 plasticity (TMS measures) and motor symptoms and function (clinical outcomes) were measured at different timepoints. The real-real session induced the largest motor improvements, with possible summation of effects between sessions, and maintenance at follow-up (80 days later). This was paralleled by changes of M1 facilitation and inhibition. This sheds a new light on the link between TMS measures of M1 plasticity and motor changes in PD and informs on the remaining potential for neuroplasticity and functional improvement after 10 years of PD with no antiparkinsonian drug. De novo patients with PD (drug-free) should be motivated to participate in future randomized clinical trials to further test the slow-down or delay of motor decline under noninvasive neurostimulation regimens, whatever the stage of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.