ArticleHeliyon2024
Enhanced deep learning models for automatic fish species identification in underwater imagery.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep learning based optimal fish species identification to maximize production in fish ponds.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Underwater cameras are crucial in marine ecology, but their data management needs automatic species identification. This study proposes a two-stage deep learning approach. First, the Unsharp Mask Filter (UMF) preprocesses images. Then, an enhanced region-based fully convolutional network (R-FCN) detects fish using two-order integrals for position-sensitive score maps and precise region of interest (PS-Pr-RoI) pooling for accuracy. The second stage integrates ShuffleNetV2 with the Squeeze and Excitation (SE) module, forming the Improved ShuffleNetV2 model, enhancing classification focus. Hyperparameters are optimized with the Enhanced Northern Goshawk Optimization Algorithm (ENGO). The improved R-FCN model achieves 99.94 % accuracy, 99.58 % precision and recall, and a 99.27 % F-measure on the Fish4knowledge dataset. Similarly, the ENGO-based ShuffleNetV2 model, evaluated on the same dataset, shows 99.93 % accuracy, 99.19 % precision, 98.29 % recall, and a 98.71 % F-measure, highlighting its superior classification accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.