Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39170323›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Pilot study on optimizing pressure for standardized capillary refill time measurement.

Zi-Yu Ma, Shen Sun, Shui-Cai Wu, Lan Lin, Yi-Xiong Chen, Dong Zhao, Stephen P Morgan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zi-Yu MaFaculty of Environment and Life, Beijing University of Technology, China, No. 100 Pingleyuan, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100124, China.
Shen SunFaculty of Environment and Life, Beijing University of Technology, China, No. 100 Pingleyuan, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100124, China.
Shui-Cai WuFaculty of Environment and Life, Beijing University of Technology, China, No. 100 Pingleyuan, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100124, China.
Lan LinFaculty of Environment and Life, Beijing University of Technology, China, No. 100 Pingleyuan, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100124, China.
Yi-Xiong ChenBeijing Science and Technology Project Manager Management Corporation Ltd, Beijing, China.
Dong ZhaoDepartment of Endocrinology, Beijing LuHe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Stephen P MorganOptics and Photonics Research Group, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Capillary Refill Time (CRT) measurement has gained increasing attention in the field of sepsis and septic shock. Recognizing pressure as a fundamental determinant in CRT measurement is crucial for establishing a standardized CRT measurement procedure. In this preliminary study, we elucidated the optimal pressing strength for CRT measurement by analyzing the CRTs measured under varying pressures. Method: Seventeen healthy individuals were enlisted to undergo CRT tests on their fingertips at various pressure levels. The applied force was initiated at 0.5N and incrementally increased by 0.5N until it reached 10.5N. An integrated Photoplethysmography (PPG) device was employed to capture fluctuations in light intensity. The CRT was automatically derived from the PPG signals via a specialized algorithm. The study included correlation assessment and reliability evaluation. Box plot and Bland-Altman plot were used to visualize the impact of pressure levels on CRTs. Results: A dataset of 1414 CRTs across 21 pressures showed significant differences (Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.0001), highlighting the impact of pressure on CRT. CRT values between 4.5N and 10.5N pressures varied less, with an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of 0.499 indicating moderate consistency. Notably, CRTs at 10N and 10.5N pressures revealed a high ICC of 0.790, suggesting strong agreement. Conclusion: A pressure range of 4.5N-10.5N is recommended for stable CRT measurements, with 10.0N-10.5N providing optimal consistency and reliability.

Indexed as

Capillary refill timeMicrocirculationPressureSepsisSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID39170323
PMCPMC11336845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.