ReviewHeliyon2024
Artificial intelligence-based predictive model for guidance on treatment strategy selection in oral and maxillofacial surgery.
Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering Functional Biomaterials for Targeted and Localized Cancer Drug Delivery: A Structure-Property-Performance Design Perspective.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Surgical Problems and Postoperative Morbidity in Mandibular Third Molar Extractions.Annals of African medicine · 2026Article
- Can artificial intelligence in orthopantomography advance dental diagnostics through automated image analysis?Frontiers in radiology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in surgical planning and outcome prediction for obstructive sleep apnea: emerging hype or the future standard?Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025Review
- AI-based neoadjuvant immunotherapy response prediction across pan-cancer: a comprehensive review.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
- The Expanding Role of Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: A Cross-Specialty Chairside Perspective.Cureus · 2025Review
- Enhancing predictive analytics in mandibular third molar extraction using artificial intelligence: A CBCT-Based study.The Saudi dental journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Application of deep learning (DL) and machine learning (ML) is rapidly increasing in the medical field. DL is gaining significance for medical image analysis, particularly, in oral and maxillofacial surgeries. Owing to the ability to accurately identify and categorize both diseased and normal soft- and hard-tissue structures, DL has high application potential in the diagnosis and treatment of tumors and in orthognathic surgeries. Moreover, DL and ML can be used to develop prediction models that can aid surgeons to assess prognosis by analyzing the patient's medical history, imaging data, and surgical records, develop more effective treatment strategies, select appropriate surgical modalities, and evaluate the risk of postoperative complications. Such prediction models can play a crucial role in the selection of treatment strategies for oral and maxillofacial surgeries. Their practical application can improve the utilization of medical staff, increase the treatment accuracy and efficiency, reduce surgical risks, and provide an enhanced treatment experience to patients. However, DL and ML face limitations, such as data drift, unstable model results, and vulnerable social trust. With the advancement of social concepts and technologies, the use of these models in oral and maxillofacial surgery is anticipated to become more comprehensive and extensive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.