Construction of lncRNA prognostic model related to disulfidptosis in lung adenocarcinoma.

Background: Lung cancer is one of the malignant tumors with the highest rates of morbidity and mortality worldwide. One of the most common histological types of lung cancer is lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Despite the fact that development in medicine has significantly improved some patients' prognoses, the overall survival (OS) rate is still very low. In glucose-deficient SLC7A11-overexpressed cancer cells, the accumulation of disulfide molecules leads to abnormal disulfide bonding between actin cytoskeletal proteins, interferes with their tissues, and eventually leads to actin network collapse and cell death. This mode of cell death is called disulfidptosis. Studies have shown that disulfidptosis may be a new target for cancer treatment. However, the role of disulfidptosis in LUAD is still unknown. Methods: LUAD transcriptome and clinical information from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) was downloaded. The co-expression analysis, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression, and Cox regression analysis was performed to screen the disulfidptosis-related lncRNAs (DRLs) and build the prognostic model. Kaplan-Meier curve, Cox regression analysis, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to validate the model. Then a nomogram is made to predict the prognosis of LUAD patients. Finally, fresh-collected clinical samples were used to verify the expression of DRLs in LUAD. Results: The prognostic model with six DRLs was developed to predict the prognosis of LUAD, with superior prognosis value compared to other clinical variables. The Cox regression analysis revealed that T stage, N stage and the risk score were identified as independent variables that affected LUAD prognosis. ROC curve revealed that the model has a moderate diagnostic value, with an AUC of 1-year 0.684, 3-year 0.664, and 5-year 0.588. Moreover, nine medications connected to LUAD treatment were acquired through drug sensitivity analysis. LUAD tissue validation showed that AC012073.1, AC012615.1, EMSLR, and SNHG12 were highly expressed, while AL606834.1 and AL365181.2 with low expression. Conclusion: Six DRLs were screened and verified to construct the prognostic model, which can accurately predict the LUAD prognosis. It establishes a basis for further exploration into the molecular mechanisms underlying LUAD and identification of potential biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic targets.