Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39170129›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Machine learning-driven mast cell gene signatures for prognostic and therapeutic prediction in prostate cancer.

Abudukeyoumu Maimaitiyiming, Hengqing An, Chen Xing, Xiaodong Li, Zhao Li, Junbo Bai, Cheng Luo, Tao Zhuo, Xin Huang, Aierpati Maimaiti and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Identification of a gene score related to antigen processing and presentation machinery for predicting prognosis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and its potential implications for immunotherapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Abudukeyoumu MaimaitiyimingThe First Affiliated Hospital, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Hengqing AnThe First Affiliated Hospital, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Chen XingThe First Affiliated Hospital, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Xiaodong LiThe First Affiliated Hospital, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Zhao LiDepartment of Abdominal Ultrasonography, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Junbo BaiDepartment of Pediatric Urology, Urology Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Cheng LuoThe First Affiliated Hospital, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Tao ZhuoThe First Affiliated Hospital, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Xin HuangThe First Affiliated Hospital, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Aierpati MaimaitiThe First Affiliated Hospital, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Abudushalamu AikemuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Youai Hospital, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Yujie WangThe First Affiliated Hospital, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The role of Mast cells has not been thoroughly explored in the context of prostate cancer's (PCA) unpredictable prognosis and mixed immunotherapy outcomes. Our research aims to employs a comprehensive computational methodology to evaluate Mast cell marker gene signatures (MCMGS) derived from a global cohort of 1091 PCA patients. This approach is designed to identify a robust biomarker to assist in prognosis and predicting responses to immunotherapy. Methods: This study initially identified mast cell-associated biomarkers from prostate adenocarcinoma (PRAD) patients across six international cohorts. We employed a variety of machine learning techniques, including Random Forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Lasso regression, and the Cox Proportional Hazards Model, to develop an effective MCMGS from candidate genes. Subsequently, an immunological assessment of MCMGS was conducted to provide new insights into the evaluation of immunotherapy responses and prognostic assessments. Additionally, we utilized Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) and pathway analysis to explore the biological pathways and mechanisms associated with MCMGS. Results: MCMGS incorporated 13 marker genes and was successful in segregating patients into distinct high- and low-risk categories. Prognostic efficacy was confirmed by survival analysis incorporating MCMGS scores, alongside clinical parameters such as age, T stage, and Gleason scores. High MCMGS scores were correlated with upregulated pathways in fatty acid metabolism and β-alanine metabolism, while low scores correlated with DNA repair mechanisms, homologous recombination, and cell cycle progression. Patients classified as low-risk displayed increased sensitivity to drugs, indicating the utility of MCMGS in forecasting responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Conclusion: The combination of MCMGS with a robust machine learning methodology demonstrates considerable promise in guiding personalized risk stratification and informing therapeutic decisions for patients with PCA.

Indexed as

Computational biologyMast cell markersPatient stratificationPredictive biomarkerProstate cancerTranscriptomics analysis

Identifiers

PMID39170129
PMCPMC11336432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.