ArticleHeliyon2024
DenseNet201Plus: Cost-effective transfer-learning architecture for rapid leaf disease identification with attention mechanisms.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hybrid metaheuristic optimization of a DeepFusionNet for plant leaf disease diagnosis and recommendation.Plant methods · 2026Article
- PLDC-Net: A Domain-Specific Base Model for Plant Leaf Disease Classification Domain Adaptation Tasks.Plant direct · 2026Article
- RTCB: an integrated deep learning model for garlic leaf disease identification.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant leaf diseases are a significant concern in agriculture due to their detrimental impact on crop productivity and food security. Effective disease management depends on the early and accurate detection and diagnosis of these conditions, facilitating timely intervention and mitigation strategies. In this study, we address the pressing need for accurate and efficient methods for detecting leaf diseases by introducing a new architecture called DenseNet201Plus. DenseNet201 was modified by including superior data augmentation and pre-processing techniques, an attention-based transition mechanism, multiple attention modules, and dense blocks. These modifications enhance the robustness and accuracy of the proposed DenseNet201Plus model in diagnosing diseases related to plant leaves. The proposed architecture was trained using two distinct datasets: Banana Leaf Disease and Black Gram Leaf Disease. Through extensive experimentation, we evaluated the performance of DenseNet201Plus in terms of various classification metrics and achieved values of 0.9012, 0.9012, 0.9012, and 0.9716 for accuracy, precision, recall, and AUC for the banana leaf disease dataset, respectively. Similarly, the black gram leaf disease dataset model provides values of 0.9950, 0.9950, 0.9950, and 1.0 for accuracy, precision, recall, and AUC. Compared to other well-known pre-trained convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures, our proposed model demonstrates superior performance in both utilized datasets. Last but not least, we combined the strength of Grad-CAM++ with our proposed model to enhance the interpretability and localization of disease areas, providing valuable insights for agricultural practitioners and researchers to make informed decisions and optimize disease management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.