ArticleHeliyon2024
Clinical impact of metagenomic next-generation sequencing of bronchoalveolar lavage fluids for the diagnosis of pulmonary infections in respiratory intensive care unit.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Severe viral infections requiring intensive care unit admissions- aetiology, co-infections, respiratory interventions and outcomes.Infection · 2026Article
- Clinical value of radial endobronchial ultrasound combined with metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the malignant tumors patients with pulmonary infection.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors in non-HIV patients withFrontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Specimen-specific differences in clinical metagenomic sequencing reporting patterns in hospitalized patients: a single-center retrospective observational study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Observational
- Clinical application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of severe pneumonia pathogens.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The real-world clinical impact of mNGS on BALF in the respiratory intensive care unit (RICU) is not yet fully understood. Methods: We investigated the clinical impact of mNGS on BALF samples obtained from 92 patients admitted to the RICU over a 2-year period. We utilized both mNGS and culture methods to evaluate the effectiveness of mNGS in diagnosing pulmonary infections. The clinical impact of mNGS were evaluated by the clinician committees. Results: Among the 92 diagnosed patients, 78 cases (84.7 %) were determined to have infectious diseases caused by pathogenic microorganisms, and the bacterial infections constituted the most prevalent diagnostic category. For mixed infection, the most common type was the Conclusions: The BALF mNGS has a positive real-world impact in RICU. Clinician committee play a critical role in ensuring the appropriate use of mNGS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.