Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39170045›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

The role of artificial intelligence in disease prediction: using ensemble model to predict disease mellitus.

Qinyuan Du, Dongli Wang, Yimin Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qinyuan DuKey Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Classical Theory, Ministry of Education, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Dongli WangKey Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Classical Theory, Ministry of Education, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Yimin ZhangKey Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Classical Theory, Ministry of Education, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The traditional complications of diabetes are well known and continue to pose a considerable burden to millions of people with diabetes mellitus (DM). With the continuous accumulation of medical data and technological advances, artificial intelligence has shown great potential and advantages in the prediction, diagnosis, and treatment of DM. When DM is diagnosed, some subjective factors and diagnostic methods of doctors will have an impact on the diagnostic results, so the use of artificial intelligence for fast and effective early prediction of DM patients can provide decision-making support to doctors and give more accurate treatment services to patients in time, which is of great clinical medical significance and practical significance. In this paper, an adaptive Stacking ensemble model is proposed based on the theory of "error-ambiguity decomposition," which can adaptively select the base classifiers from the pre-selected models. The adaptive Stacking ensemble model proposed in this paper is compared with KNN, SVM, RF, LR, DT, GBDT, XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, MLP and traditional Stacking ensemble models. The results showed that the adaptive Stacking ensemble model achieved the best performance in five evaluation metrics: accuracy, precision, recall, F1 value and AUC value, which were 0.7559, 0.7286, 0.8132, 0.7686 and 0.8436. The model can effectively predict DM patients and provide a reference value for the screening and diagnosis of clinical DM.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencediabetes mellitusdisease predictionmachine learningStacking ensemble model

Identifiers

PMID39170045
PMCPMC11335546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.