Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39170038›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2024

Targeting gut-microbiota for gastric cancer treatment: a systematic review.

Amir Marashi, Saina Hasany, Sadra Moghimi, Reza Kiani, Sina Mehran Asl, Yasamin Alavi Dareghlou, Parsa Lorestani, Shirin Varmazyar, Fatemeh Jafari, Shakiba Ataeian and 7 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Amir MarashiSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Saina HasanyStudent Research Committee, Islamic Azad University Tehran Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sadra MoghimiSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Reza KianiStudent Research Committee, Islamic Azad University Tehran Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Sina Mehran AslSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Yasamin Alavi DareghlouStudent Research Committee, Islamic Azad University Tehran Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Parsa LorestaniSchool of Medicine, Shahroud Azad University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.
Shirin VarmazyarStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Alborz, Iran.
Fatemeh JafariSchool of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Shakiba AtaeianSchool of Pharmacy, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Kiana NaghaviStudent Research Committee, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Mohammad SajjadiStudent Research Committee, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Negar HaratianSchool of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Arman AlinezhadStudent Research Committee, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Aida AzhdarimoghaddamStudent Research Committee, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Seyed Kiarash Sadat RafieiSchool of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mahsa Asadi AnarStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Preclinical research has identified the mechanisms via which bacteria influence cancer treatment outcomes. Clinical studies have demonstrated the potential to modify the microbiome in cancer treatment. Herein, we systematically analyze how gut microorganisms interact with chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors, specifically focusing on how gut bacteria affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cancer treatment. Method: This study searched Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed until August 2023. Studies were screened by their title and abstract using the Rayyan intelligent tool for systematic reviews. Quality assessment of studies was done using the JBI critical appraisal tool. Result: Alterations in the gut microbiome are associated with gastric cancer and precancerous lesions. These alterations include reduced microbial alpha diversity, increased bacterial overgrowth, and decreased richness and evenness of gastric bacteria. Conclusion: Probiotics and targeted interventions to modulate the gut microbiome have shown promising results in cancer prevention and treatment efficacy.

Indexed as

gastric cancergut microbiotaimmune regulationimmunotherapymicrobial metabolites

Identifiers

PMID39170038
PMCPMC11337614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.