ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
Predicting intraoperative major blood loss in microsurgery for brain arteriovenous malformations.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Occipital Pial AVM Rupture in a Young Adult: Dual Intranidal Aneurysms, Solitary Parasagittal SSS Drainage, and Hematoma-Corridor Microsurgical Cure.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Intraoperative blood loss poses a great challenge for brain arteriovenous malformation (AVM) microsurgery, although systematic researches are still lacking. This study aimed to identify factors predicting intraoperative major blood loss in brain AVM microsurgery and to investigate its impact on patient outcome. To deal with the fierce bleeding, we introduced a modified hemostatic method, bone-wax (BW) coated bipolar electrocoagulation. Methods: The authors retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 131 patients (50/81 in intraoperative major/non-major blood loss cohort) with brain AVMs who underwent microsurgery in our center during the period between January 2018 and April 2023. According to previous studies, major blood loss was defined as blood loss of at least 1,000 mL. The accuracy and objectivity of our grouping methodology were validated by comparing the hemoglobin mass loss, hematocrit loss and factors associated with intraoperative bleeding. Potential clinical and radiological predictors for intraoperative major blood loss were evaluated using a multivariate stepwise logistic regression. And outcomes of patients in the two cohorts were also compared. At last, the performance of BW coated bipolar electrocoagulation in brain AVM microsurgery was illustrated by the case presentation, histological staining and transmission electron microscopy of the coagulated nidus vessels. Results: Hemoglobin mass loss, hematocrit loss and factors associated with intraoperative bleeding were significant different between the two cohorts. five independent factors predicting intraoperative major blood loss were identified: (1) clinical manifestations; (2,3) location and size of the nidus; (4) deep venous drainage; and (5) the number of draining veins. And the intraoperative major blood loss can not only adversely affect the surgical progression, but also predict poor perioperative outcomes for patients. Regarding the application of BW coated bipolar electrocoagulation, we found the novel hemostatic method exerted efficient hemostatic effect and reduced the damage to the vascular structure in brain AVM microsurgery. Conclusion: This study proposed a nomogram for neurosurgeons to predict intraoperative major blood loss in brain AVM microsurgery preoperatively. And intraoperative major blood loss is associated with poor patient outcomes. In addition, BW coated bipolar electrocoagulation, can be applied to control ferocious bleeding during brain AVM microsurgery, which still remains further researches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.