Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39169971›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2024

Accelerating AI for science: open data science for science.

Neil D Lawrence, Jessica Montgomery

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Crystallography in Open Science and its open educational resources.Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances · 2026
    Article
  2. Structuring privacy policy: an AI approach.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Neil D LawrenceDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9258-1030
Jessica MontgomeryDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0131-031X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aspirations for artificial intelligence (AI) as a catalyst for scientific discovery are growing. High-profile successes deploying AI in domains such as protein folding have highlighted AI's potential to unlock new frontiers of scientific knowledge. However, the pathway from AI innovation to deployment in research is not linear. Those seeking to drive a new wave of scientific progress through the application of AI require a diffusion engine that can enhance AI adoption across disciplines. Lessons from previous waves of technology change, experiences of deploying AI in real-world contexts and an emerging research agenda from the AI for science community suggest a framework for accelerating AI adoption. This framework requires action to build supply chains of ideas between disciplines; rapidly transfer technological capabilities through open research; create AI tools that empower researchers; and embed effective data stewardship. Together, these interventions can cultivate an environment of open data science that deliver the benefits of AI across the sciences.

Indexed as

AIAI for scienceAI policyopen science

Identifiers

PMID39169971
PMCPMC11336680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.