Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39169962›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2024

Sensory feedback and central neuronal interactions in mouse locomotion.

Yaroslav I Molkov, Guoning Yu, Jessica Ausborn, Julien Bouvier, Simon M Danner, Ilya A Rybak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yaroslav I MolkovDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0862-1974
Guoning YuDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.
Jessica AusbornDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19129, USA.
Julien BouvierUniversité Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Institut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay, Saclay 91400, France.
Simon M DannerDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19129, USA.
Ilya A RybakDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19129, USA.

Funding

Propriopsinal neuron function in normal and post-SCI locomotionR01NS112304 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI Simon Michael Danner, David SK Magnuson · 2021 to 2026
$3.0M
Spinal circuits for sensorimotor integration and interlimb coordination during locomotionR01NS115900 · NINDS · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI DANNER, SIMON MICHAEL · 2020 to 2024
$1.7M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS112304NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS115900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Locomotion is a complex process involving specific interactions between the central neural controller and the mechanical components of the system. The basic rhythmic activity generated by locomotor circuits in the spinal cord defines rhythmic limb movements and their central coordination. The operation of these circuits is modulated by sensory feedback from the limbs providing information about the state of the limbs and the body. However, the specific role and contribution of central interactions and sensory feedback in the control of locomotor gait and posture remain poorly understood. We use biomechanical data on quadrupedal locomotion in mice and recent findings on the organization of neural interactions within the spinal locomotor circuitry to create and analyse a tractable mathematical model of mouse locomotion. The model includes a simplified mechanical model of the mouse body with four limbs and a central controller composed of four rhythm generators, each operating as a state machine controlling the state of one limb. Feedback signals characterize the load and extension of each limb as well as postural stability (balance). We systematically investigate and compare several model versions and compare their behaviour to existing experimental data on mouse locomotion. Our results highlight the specific roles of sensory feedback and some central propriospinal interactions between circuits controlling fore and hind limbs for speed-dependent gait expression. Our models suggest that postural imbalance feedback may be critically involved in the control of swing-to-stance transitions in each limb and the stabilization of walking direction.

Indexed as

biomechanicslocomotionmathematical modellingsensory feedbackspinal circuits

Identifiers

PMID39169962
PMCPMC11335407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.