ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences
Evaluation of the Impact of a Pharmacist-Conducted Hypertension Clinic.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hypertension can lead to cardiovascular and other health complications. Many hypertensive patients in the community may receive poor care and monitoring due to financial and other concerns. Pharmacists could support patients in improving their health outcomes. This research aims to assess the impact of pharmacist-led hypertensive clinics in a community pharmacy setting. Methods: The study was an interventional exploratory design in a community pharmacy in Dubai, UAE. All eligible patients who consented were enrolled in the study, making it a population-based study. Patients' blood pressure (BP) was measured before starting the intervention and measured monthly for a minimum of 6 months of care. Measuring BP, physician referral for management of hypertension, lifestyle, diet, and medication counseling were the interventions provided by the researcher on a case-to-case basis as needed in each patient encounter. Toward the end of the study, a patient satisfaction survey was conducted. The survey form showed internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha = 0.895. Results: About 30 patients were provided pharmacy services by a pharmacist for 613 months. All patients'' BP were monitored monthly. Patients showed reductions in their systolic and diastolic BP levels with the continued care of the pharmacist. (The mean systolic BP significantly decreased from 155 mmHg (standard deviation (SD) = 14.4, median = 151) at baseline to 128 mmHg (SD = 3.1, median = 129) with a Conclusion: In conclusion, the study has shown the impact of pharmacist-led antihypertensive clinics in systolic BP control and achieving high patient satisfaction. The study generated insights into participant cooperation with pharmacist services and needs. More research on different outcomes is planned for future studies, including systematic pharmacotherapy work-up, patient medication adherence, and other clinical outcomes in the study population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.