ArticleJournal of migration and health2024
Differentials in self-reported health status and healthcare utilization among homeless women during the antenatal period in urban settings: Does migration status matter?
Article in Journal of migration and health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Self-rated health status and associated factors in Ilam, west of Iran: results of a population-based cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Limited studies have covered the nexus between homelessness, migration, and maternal health. However, most homeless women are migrants and have high-risk fertility behaviors. Therefore, the present study examines the variation in antenatal health and healthcare behavior among homeless women, focusing on migration status. Methods: The present study employed a mixed-methods approach. A cross-sectional quantitative survey using Time and Location sampling (TLS) and face-to-face interviews was carried out for the quantitative component. Further, qualitative data was gathered through in-depth interviews using purposive sampling. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analysis with the Pearson chi-square test, and multivariate logistic models estimated qualitative results. Further, the thematic analysis presented qualitative findings. Results: Out of 400 respondents, 76 % were migrants, and 57 % reported poor SRH. The likelihood of poor SRH was 1.07 times higher among migrants than non-migrants. A higher likelihood of poor SRH was found among beggars and ragpickers. Similarly, it was prevalent among the respondents who lived alone, mainly migrants. Almost 80 % of migrants reported experiencing depression. The unmet need for health visits was substantial among the study population (41 %), and it was found to be noteworthy among migrants (51 %). Several individual, socioeconomic, and structural factors were identified as barriers to healthcare utilization. Conclusion: Poor antenatal health was substantial among homeless women, mainly migrants. Public and private healthcare visits were inadequate among homeless women who were migrants. Several individual, socioeconomic, and structural factors affected healthcare utilization. The study highlights the urgent need to introduce population-centric programs and policies to promote reproductive health among homeless women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.