Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39169641›Full record

SynthesisHuman brain mapping2024

Comprehensive investigation of predictive processing: A cross- and within-cognitive domains fMRI meta-analytic approach.

Cristiano Costa, Rachele Pezzetta, Fabio Masina, Sara Lago, Simone Gastaldon, Camilla Frangi, Sarah Genon, Giorgio Arcara, Cristina Scarpazza

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Human brain mapping, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Cristiano CostaPadova Neuroscience Center, Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5472-546X
Rachele PezzettaIRCCS Ospedale San Camillo, Venice, Italy.
Fabio MasinaIRCCS Ospedale San Camillo, Venice, Italy.
Sara LagoPadova Neuroscience Center, Padua, Italy.
Simone GastaldonPadova Neuroscience Center, Padua, Italy.
Camilla FrangiDipartimento di Psicologia Generale, Università degli Studi di Padova, Padua, Italy.
Sarah GenonInstitute for Systems Neuroscience, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Giorgio ArcaraIRCCS Ospedale San Camillo, Venice, Italy.
Cristina ScarpazzaIRCCS Ospedale San Camillo, Venice, Italy.

Funding

Fondo per il Programma Nazionale di Ricerca e Progetti di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale del Piano Nazionale di Ripresa e Resilienza (PRIN 2022 PNRR) P2022LC5AKFondo per il Programma Nazionale di Ricerca e Progetti di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale (PRIN 2022) 2022XKZBFCItalian Ministry of Health (Ricerca Corrente)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predictive processing (PP) stands as a predominant theoretical framework in neuroscience. While some efforts have been made to frame PP within a cognitive domain-general network perspective, suggesting the existence of a "prediction network," these studies have primarily focused on specific cognitive domains or functions. The question of whether a domain-general predictive network that encompasses all well-established cognitive domains exists remains unanswered. The present meta-analysis aims to address this gap by testing the hypothesis that PP relies on a large-scale network spanning across cognitive domains, supporting PP as a unified account toward a more integrated approach to neuroscience. The Activation Likelihood Estimation meta-analytic approach was employed, along with Meta-Analytic Connectivity Mapping, conjunction analysis, and behavioral decoding techniques. The analyses focused on prediction incongruency and prediction congruency, two conditions likely reflective of core phenomena of PP. Additionally, the analysis focused on a prediction phenomena-independent dimension, regardless of prediction incongruency and congruency. These analyses were first applied to each cognitive domain considered (cognitive control, attention, motor, language, social cognition). Then, all cognitive domains were collapsed into a single, cross-domain dimension, encompassing a total of 252 experiments. Results pertaining to prediction incongruency rely on a defined network across cognitive domains, while prediction congruency results exhibited less overall activation and slightly more variability across cognitive domains. The converging patterns of activation across prediction phenomena and cognitive domains highlight the role of several brain hubs unfolding within an organized large-scale network (Dynamic Prediction Network), mainly encompassing bilateral insula, frontal gyri, claustrum, parietal lobules, and temporal gyri. Additionally, the crucial role played at a cross-domain, multimodal level by the anterior insula, as evidenced by the conjunction and Meta-Analytic Connectivity Mapping analyses, places it as the major hub of the Dynamic Prediction Network. Results support the hypothesis that PP relies on a domain-general, large-scale network within whose regions PP units are likely to operate, depending on the context and environmental demands. The wide array of regions within the Dynamic Prediction Network seamlessly integrate context- and stimulus-dependent predictive computations, thereby contributing to the adaptive updating of the brain's models of the inner and external world.

Indexed as

Brain MappingCognitionBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNerve NetALE meta‐analysiscognitive functionsdomain‐generalencodingnetworkpredictive processingviolation

Identifiers

PMID39169641
PMCPMC11339134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.