Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39169600›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2024

A Retrospective Study of 290 Patients with Resectable Benign and Malignant Gastric Neoplasms to Compare Postoperative Outcomes of Endoscopic Resection with and without the Internal Traction Method Using a Spring-and-Loop with Clip (S-O Clip).

Yoichi Nakatsu, Makoto Furihata, Anna Fujiyama, Arisa Yuzawa, Mako Ushio, Shintaro Yano, Hiroki Okawa, Kumiko Noda, Shinjiro Nishi, Shingo Ogiwara and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Endoscopic subserosal dissection for early gastric cancer with severe fibrosis attributable to gastric ulcer scar.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yoichi NakatsuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Urayasu, Chiba, Japan.
Makoto FurihataDepartment of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Urayasu, Chiba, Japan.
Anna FujiyamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Urayasu, Chiba, Japan.
Arisa YuzawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Urayasu, Chiba, Japan.
Mako UshioDepartment of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Urayasu, Chiba, Japan.
Shintaro YanoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Urayasu, Chiba, Japan.
Hiroki OkawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Urayasu, Chiba, Japan.
Kumiko NodaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Urayasu, Chiba, Japan.
Shinjiro NishiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Urayasu, Chiba, Japan.
Shingo OgiwaraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Urayasu, Chiba, Japan.
Tsuneo KitamuraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Urayasu, Chiba, Japan.
Naoto SakamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Urayasu, Chiba, Japan.
Taro OsadaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Urayasu, Chiba, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND The spring-and-loop with clip (S-O clip) consists of a spring and a nylon loop located on one side of the claws of the clip, and is used in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) to allow countertraction. This retrospective study included 290 patients with early gastric neoplasms (eGNs) and aimed to compare postoperative outcomes of ESD with and without the use of the S-O clip. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the data of 347 patients with eGN who underwent ESD, with or without an S-O clip, at our institution between April 1, 2017 and March 31, 2023. Overall, 290 patients were analyzed after excluding ineligible participants. The control group (n=149; adenoma: 1, carcinoma: 148) underwent ESD without an S-O clip between April 2017 and March 2020, while the S-O group (n=141; adenoma: 4, carcinoma: 137) used the clip between April 2020 and March 2023. Primary outcomes included procedure time, en bloc resection rate, and complete resection rate. Subgroup analysis for examined procedure time concerning endoscopist expertise, submucosal fibrosis, and neoplasm locations. RESULTS The S-O group had a shorter procedure time (44.4±23.9 vs 61.1±40.9 min, P<0.001) and a higher complete resection rate (97.9% vs 92.6%, P<0.05) than the control group. Subgroup analysis revealed that the S-O clip significantly reduced procedure time for trainees compared to the control group (40.8±18.3 vs 61.1±35.6 min, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS The scheduled use of S-O clips in gastric ESD is effective in improving procedural time and complete resection rates, benefiting endoscopists across all experience levels.

Indexed as

Endoscopic Mucosal ResectionStomach NeoplasmsAdenomaAdultAgedFemaleGastroscopyHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePostoperative PeriodRetrospective StudiesSurgical InstrumentsTractionTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID39169600
PMCPMC11348818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.