Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39169561›Full record

Trial reportPsychophysiology2025

Can transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation mitigate vigilance loss? Examining the effects of stimulation at individualized versus constant current intensity.

Fernando G Luna, Juan Lupiáñez, Stefanie König, Ulrike Garscha, Rico Fischer

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fernando G LunaInstitute of Psychology, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0698-2263
Juan LupiáñezDepartment of Experimental Psychology, and Mind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6157-9894
Stefanie KönigInstitute of Pharmacy, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID 0009-0009-8979-3134
Ulrike GarschaInstitute of Pharmacy, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3645-7833
Rico FischerInstitute of Psychology, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7142-1756

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 513247174Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness PID2020.114790 GB.I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to the arousal model of vigilance, the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine (LC-NE) system modulates sustained attention over long periods by regulating physiological arousal. Recent research has proposed that transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) modulates indirect physiological markers of LC-NE activity, although its effects on vigilance have not yet been examined. Aiming to develop a safe and noninvasive procedure to prevent vigilance failures in prolonged tasks, the present study examined whether taVNS can mitigate vigilance loss while modulating indirect markers of LC-NE activity. Following a preregistered protocol (https://osf.io/tu2xy/), 50 participants completed three repeated sessions in a randomized order, in which either active taVNS at individualized intensity set by participant, active taVNS set at 0.5 mA for all participants, or sham taVNS, was delivered while performing an attentional and vigilance task (i.e., ANTI-Vea). Changes in salivary alpha-amylase and cortisol concentrations were measured as markers of LC-NE activity. Self-reports of feelings associated with stimulation and guessing rate of active/sham conditions supported the efficacy of the single-blind procedure. Contrary to our predictions, the observed vigilance decrement was not modulated by active taVNS. Pairwise comparisons showed a mitigation by active taVNS on cortisol reduction across time. Interestingly, Spearman's correlational analyses showed some interindividual effects of taVNS on indirect markers of LC-NE, evidenced by positive associations between changes in salivary alpha-amylase and cortisol in active but not sham taVNS. We highlight the relevance of replicating and extending the present outcomes, investigating further parameters of stimulation and its effects on other indirect markers of LC-NE activity.

Indexed as

ArousalAttentionHydrocortisoneLocus CoeruleusPsychomotor PerformanceTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationVagus Nerve StimulationAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleSalivaSalivary alpha-AmylasesSingle-Blind MethodYoung AdultHydrocortisoneSalivary alpha-Amylasesalpha‐amylaseattentioncortisollocus coeruleus‐norepinephrinetaVNSvigilance

Identifiers

PMID39169561
PMCPMC11775886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.