Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39169516›Full record

ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2024

Survey on the knowledge and practices in anorexia of aging diagnosis and management in Japan.

Sahoko Takagi, Shosuke Satake, Ken Sugimoto, Masafumi Kuzuya, Masahiro Akishita, Hidenori Arai, Ivan Aprahamian, Andrew J Coats, Tatiana Klompenhouwer, Stefan D Anker and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sahoko TakagiDepartment of Nutrition Management, Hospital, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan.ORCID 0009-0008-0829-402X
Shosuke SatakeDepartment of Nutrition Management, Hospital, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0301-1461
Ken SugimotoDepartment of General and Geriatric Medicine, Kawasaki Medical University, Okayama, Japan.
Masafumi KuzuyaMeitetsu Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Masahiro AkishitaTokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.
Hidenori AraiNational Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan.
Ivan AprahamianDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Jundiaí Medical School, Jundiaí, Brazil.
Andrew J CoatsHeart Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Tatiana KlompenhouwerSociety on Sarcopenia, Cachexia and Wasting Disorders, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Stefan D AnkerDepartment of Cardiology (CVK) of German Heart Center Charité, Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) partner site Berlin, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Hidetaka WakabayashiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

Research Funding of Longevity Sciences 22-4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnorexia of aging (AA) is a condition in older adults that includes loss of appetite and reduced food intake. There is a lack of detailed analysis of the potential influence of educational initiatives in addressing AA. This study aimed to clarify the current state of knowledge and practice regarding AA and its relationship with the availability of continuing education opportunities among Japanese healthcare professionals involved in treating older patients.

methodsThe Japan Geriatrics Society and the Japanese Association on Sarcopenia and Frailty, in collaboration with the Society on Sarcopenia, Cachexia, and Wasting Disorders, conducted an online questionnaire survey on the knowledge and practices in AA detection and management. Questions were asked in the areas of demographics, screening, definition/diagnosis, treatment, referral, and awareness, with those who 'participate' in continuing education and professional development programmes in nutrition for their patients were classified as the 'education group' and those who 'do not participate' were classified as the 'non-education group'. The results for each question were compared.

resultsThe analysis included 870 participants (physicians, 48%; registered dietitians, 16%; rehabilitation therapists, 14%; pharmacists, 12%; nurses, 6%; and other professionals, 5%). The education group (45%) was more likely than the non-education group (55%) to use the Mini-Nutritional Assessment Short Form (MNA-SF) to screen for AA (49% vs. 27%) and less likely not to use a validated tool (33% vs. 47%). More participants used evidence-based tools and materials for AA care (38% vs. 12%), and fewer used their clinical judgement (23% vs. 35%) or were unaware of the tools and materials (9% vs. 23%). The proportion using a team of professionals experienced in AA care were 47% and 24% of the education and non-education groups, respectively. By profession, few physicians used specific validated tools and resources for AA screening and treatment. More than half of the dietitians used the MNA-SF regardless of training opportunity availability. Regarding professional availability and team use, differences in educational opportunities were particularly large among physicians.

conclusionsParticipation in continuing education programmes on nutrition is associated with responsiveness to AA screening and treatment and the availability of a team of professionals, which may influence the quality of AA treatment. Nutrition education may support the confidence of healthcare professionals working with older adults in AA with complex clinical signs and encourage them to conduct evidence-based practice.

Indexed as

AnorexiaHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAgedAged, 80 and overAgingDisease ManagementFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesAnorexia of agingContinuing educationGeriatric anorexiaHealthcare professionalsOlder patients

Identifiers

PMID39169516
PMCPMC11446682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.