ArticleBMC psychology2024
Psychometric evaluation of the affiliate stigma scale for caregivers of people with mental illness in Uganda.
Article in BMC psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Affiliate stigma among family caregivers of people with mental disorders: results from a national survey in Italy.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAffiliate stigma is common among caregivers of people with mental illness and impacts negatively on the caregivers' quality of life and their ability to care for the patients. Although there is evidence of affiliate stigma in sub-Saharan Africa, the psychometric properties of commonly used tools are not available in the African context. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the factor structure of the affiliate stigma scale among caregivers of people with mental illness in southwestern Uganda. Having a validated method to assess affiliate stigma in the Ugandan setting helps to appropriately evaluate affiliate stigma among caregivers of people with mental illnesses, which could inform the development of interventions to support such caregivers.
methodA total of 385 caregivers of people with mental illness attending outpatient psychiatry clinics in selected tertiary hospitals in southwestern Uganda were enrolled in the study. The affiliate stigma and depression were assessed using the affiliate stigma scale and the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9) respectively. We conducted exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis to determine the factor structure, reliability and validity of the affiliate stigma scale. We also evaluated the convergent validity of the affiliate stigma scale by determining the correlation between affiliate stigma scale scores and the PHQ-9.
resultMore than half of participants were male (55.06%) and majority of caregivers were living in rural areas (80.26%). The sample size was adequate, as evidenced by the KMO of 0.91 and the inter-correlation was sufficient to conduct the factor analysis, according to the Bartlett test. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed four factors and all 22 items were retained as all of them had a factor loading > 0.4. The internal consistency of the total scale was excellent (alpha = 0.92). The affiliate stigma score correlated with depression which has been hypothesized to be associated with the stigma of mental illness.
conclusionThe study findings show the affiliate stigma scale as a valid measure of affiliate stigma among the caregivers of patients with mental illness in southwestern Uganda. Therefore, this scale provides an opportunity to mental health care providers to assess affiliate stigma and develop interventions aimed at prevention stigma among caregivers and improve outcomes among people with mental illness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.