ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2024
Prognostic analysis of destroyed-lung patients with preoperative massive hemoptysis: a 20-year retrospective study.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk Factors for the Recurrence of Massive Hemoptysis Treated With Bronchial Artery Embolization: A Retrospective Study.The clinical respiratory journal · 2026Article
- Comprehensive analysis of prognostic factors and clinical implications of pneumonectomy for destroyed lung.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurgery is the main treatment option for destroyed-lung (DL) patients with life-threatening massive hemoptysis. However, short-term and long-term surgical safety and efficacy are unclear, prompting this study.
methodsData from 124 DL patients undergoing surgery between November 2001 and January 2022 at Beijing Chest Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Data of the DL group (82 cases) and DL + massive hemoptysis group (42 cases) were compared with regard to clinical characteristics, long-term postoperative residual lung reinfection.
resultsAs compared with DL group rates, The DL + massive hemoptysis group had greater incidence rates of postoperative complications, invasive postoperative respiratory support, long-term postoperative residual lung reinfection, and postoperative tuberculosis recurrence. Revealed risk factors for postoperative complications (Extent of lung lesion resection), postoperative invasive respiratory therapy (preoperative Hb < 9 g/L, severe intraoperative hemoptysis), and postoperative long-term residual lung reinfection (DL with massive hemoptysis).
conclusionsDL patients with massive hemoptysis had greater rate of invasive respiratory support therapy and postoperative complications. Extensive lesion removal, preoperative anaemia, severe intraoperative bleeding associated with recent postoperative complications for the patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.