ArticleBMC cancer2024
Performance status improvement and advances in systemic treatment after brain metastases resection: a retrospective single-center cohort study of non-small cell lung cancer patients.
Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 blockade overcomes immune exclusion in NSCLC brain metastases by enhancing CD8Nature communications · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBrain metastasis (BrM) is prevalent among patients with NSCLC, and surgical resection of BrM constitutes a promising treatment strategy for local management and histopathological diagnosis, although it is offered for a select group of patients. Limited information exists concerning the improvement in performance status (PS) following BrM resection or the outcomes stratified by subsequent systemic therapy.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study including NSCLC patients with surgically resected BrM and focused on the improvement in PS and subsequent therapy after BrM resection.
results71 patients were included, and the median overall survival was 18.3 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 8.7, not reached). Patients with NSCLC who underwent surgical resection of BrM showed significant improvement in PS (18% and 39% showed ECOG PS of 0-1, before and after BrM resection, respectively [p = 0.006]), and patients with PS improvement were younger than those with PS unimprovement (median, 62 years versus 66 years; p = 0.041). Regarding subsequent systemic therapy after BrM resection, 21 patients (30%) received cytotoxic chemotherapy, 14 patients (20%) received tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), 3 patients (4%) received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and 21 patients (30%) received no subsequent therapy. The survival outcomes of patients stratified by subsequent systemic treatments suggested the tendency that those who received TKI or ICI showed better survival outcomes, although a small number of patients hindered statistical comparisons.
conclusionsWe describe the outcomes of patients with NSCLC who underwent surgical resection of BrM, revealing that younger patients were more likely to anticipate improvement in PS, and patients who received TKI or ICI after BrM resection tended to exhibit a more preferable prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.