Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39169310›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2024

Molecular characterization of PSEUDO RESPONSE REGULATOR family in Rosaceae and function of PbPRR59a and PbPRR59b in flowering regulation.

Zhe Liu, Weijuan Liu, Zhangqing Wang, Zhihua Xie, Kaijie Qi, Dong Yue, Yu Li, Shaoling Zhang, Juyou Wu, Peng Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Functional Verification of the Soybean Pseudo-Response FactorInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zhe Liu *School of Pharmacy, Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, 046000, China.
Weijuan Liu *Sanya Institute of Nanjing Agricultural University, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Horticultural Crop Breeding, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Zhangqing WangSanya Institute of Nanjing Agricultural University, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Horticultural Crop Breeding, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Zhihua XieSanya Institute of Nanjing Agricultural University, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Horticultural Crop Breeding, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Kaijie QiSanya Institute of Nanjing Agricultural University, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Horticultural Crop Breeding, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Dong YueSanya Institute of Nanjing Agricultural University, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Horticultural Crop Breeding, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Yu LiSanya Institute of Nanjing Agricultural University, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Horticultural Crop Breeding, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Shaoling ZhangSanya Institute of Nanjing Agricultural University, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Horticultural Crop Breeding, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Juyou WuSanya Institute of Nanjing Agricultural University, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Horticultural Crop Breeding, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Peng WangSanya Institute of Nanjing Agricultural University, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Horticultural Crop Breeding, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China. wangpeng@njau.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPSEUDO RESPONSE REGULATOR (PRR) genes are essential components of circadian clock, playing vital roles in multiple processes including plant growth, flowering and stress response. Nonetheless, little is known about the evolution and function of PRR family in Rosaceae species.

resultsIn this study, a total of 43 PRR genes in seven Rosaceae species were identified through comprehensive analysis. The evolutionary relationships were analyzed with phylogenetic tree, duplication events and synteny. PRR genes were classified into three groups (PRR1, PRR5/9, PRR3/7). The expansion of PRR family was mainly derived from dispersed and whole-genome duplication events. Purifying selection was the major force for PRR family evolution. Synteny analysis indicated the existence of multiple orthologous PRR gene pairs between pear and other Rosaceae species. Moreover, the conserved motifs of eight PbPRR proteins supported the phylogenetic relationship. PRR genes showed diverse expression pattern in various tissues of pear (Pyrus bretschneideri). Transcript analysis under 12-h light/ dark cycle and constant light conditions revealed that PRR genes exhibited distinct rhythmic oscillations in pear. PbPRR59a and PbPRR59b highly homologous to AtPRR5 and AtPRR9 were cloned for further functional verification. PbPRR59a and PbPRR59b proteins were localized in the nucleus. The ectopic overexpression of PbPRR59a and PbPRR59b significantly delayed flowering in Arabidopsis transgenic plants by repress the expression of AtGI, AtCO and AtFT under long-day conditions.

conclusionsThese results provide information for exploring the evolution of PRR genes in plants, and contribute to the subsequent functional studies of PRR genes in pear and other Rosaceae species.

Indexed as

FlowersGene Expression Regulation, PlantPhylogenyPlant ProteinsRosaceaeArabidopsisEvolution, MolecularMultigene FamilyPyrusSyntenyPlant ProteinsCircadian clockFlowering timeFunctional analysisGene expressionPearPSEUDO RESPONSE REGULATOR

Identifiers

PMID39169310
PMCPMC11340073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.