ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024
Enlarged posterior column osteotomy plus intervertebral cage strutting for lumbosacral nerve bowstring disease.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo explore the surgical outcome of enlarged posterior column osteotomy (EPCO) plus intervertebral cage strutting (ICS) for patients with lumbosacral nerve bowstring disease (BSD).
methodsThe clinical data of 27 patients with BSD that surgically treated with EPCO plus ICS from January 2018 to March 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), duration, length of hospital stay, SF-36 were recorded. Surgical data including operation time, blood loss, surgical level, and complications were recorded. Inter-pedicle distance and regional lumbar lordosis was measured at lateral X-ray at both pre- and postoperative.
resultsAll patients underwent the operation successfully. EPCO plus ICS was performed at L4-L5 in 9 patients, at L5-S1 in 7 patients, at L4-S1 in 6 patients, at L3-L5 in 5 patients. The mean operation time was 96.3 ± 18.0 min, mean blood loss was 350.0 ± 97.9 mL. Relaxation of thecal sac was noticed after pedicle screw-rod compression bilaterally. The mean decrease of inter-pedicle distance was 0.57 ± 0.18 cm, the mean increase of regional lumbar lordosis was 17.6 ± 6.7 degrees. Relaxation of cauda equina within the thecal sac was noticed at intra-operative after pedicle screw-rod compression bilaterally in all the patients. Most patients achieved neurological function improvement at two-year follow up.
conclusionsEPCO plus ICS procedure is an effective surgical method for lumbosacral nerve BSD through restoring the coordination between column and cord, visual relaxation of cauda equina within the thecal sac at intraoperative is the key factor in determining the relief of neurological function at postoperative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.