ArticleNature2024
The testing of AI in medicine is a mess. Here's how it should be done.
Article in Nature, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- The case for space as a model of accelerated aging.Nature aging · 2026Review
- Impact of artificial intelligence and work digitalization on mental health and occupational well-being: a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Multicenter study on the versatility and adoption of AI-driven automated radiotherapy planning across cancer types.Nature communications · 2025Article
- The patient-safety implications of AI-based communication with migrants in general practice: a scoping review.BJGP open · 2025Article
- Will large language models transform clinical prediction?Diagnostic and prognostic research · 2025Article
- Technology adoption in healthcare: Delphi consensus for the early exploration and agile adoption of emerging healthcare technology conceptual framework.BMJ health & care informatics · 2025Article
- Scientific Evidence for Clinical Text Summarization Using Large Language Models: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- "The Machine Will See You Now": A Clinician's Perspective on Artificial "Intelligence" In Clinical Care.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2025Article
- Predicting outcomes using neural networks in the intensive care unit.World journal of clinical cases · 2025Article
- Regulation of artificial intelligence in healthcare: Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) as a model.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- Testing the knowledge of artificial intelligence chatbots in pharmacology: examples of two groups of drugs.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39169244What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.