ArticleScientific reports2024
Real-time estimation of the optimal coil placement in transcranial magnetic stimulation using multi-task deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation in essential tremor: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and efficacy.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2025Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy of different modalities of transcranial magnetic stimulation for treating Parkinson's disease with depression: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Computational Insights Into Smart Bioelectronics in Digital Health Care (2020-2024): Topic Modeling Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Review
- Roadmap towards personalized approaches and safety considerations in non-ionizing radiation: from dosimetry to therapeutic and diagnostic applications.Physics in medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Comprehensive evaluation of U-Net based transcranial magnetic stimulation electric field estimations.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Precision TMS through the integration of neuroimaging and machine learning: optimizing stimulation targets for personalized treatment.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Review
- Prediction of clinical and language changes after a single session of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in primary progressive aphasia: A machine learning approach.Journal of Alzheimer's disease reportsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has emerged as a promising neuromodulation technique with both therapeutic and diagnostic applications. As accurate coil placement is known to be essential for focal stimulation, computational models have been established to help find the optimal coil positioning by maximizing electric fields at the cortical target. While these numerical simulations provide realistic and subject-specific field distributions, they are computationally demanding, precluding their use in real-time applications. In this paper, we developed a novel multi-task deep neural network which simultaneously predicts the optimal coil placement for a given cortical target as well as the associated TMS-induced electric field. Trained on large amounts of preceding numerical optimizations, the Attention U-Net-based neural surrogate provided accurate coil optimizations in only 35 ms, a fraction of time compared to the state-of-the-art numerical framework. The mean errors on the position estimates were below 2 mm, i.e., smaller than previously reported manual coil positioning errors. The predicted electric fields were also highly correlated (r> 0.97) with their numerical references. In addition to healthy subjects, we validated our approach also in glioblastoma patients. We first statistically underlined the importance of using realistic heterogeneous tumor conductivities instead of simply adopting values from the surrounding healthy tissue. Second, applying the trained neural surrogate to tumor patients yielded similar accurate positioning and electric field estimates as in healthy subjects. Our findings provide a promising framework for future real-time electric field-optimized TMS applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.