ArticleScientific reports2024
Phosphorus prediction in the middle reaches of the Yangtze river based on GRA-CEEMDAN-CNLSTM-DBO.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate and rapid prediction of water quality is crucial for the protection of aquatic ecosystems. This study aims to enhance the prediction of total phosphorus (TP) concentrations in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River by integrating advanced modeling techniques. Using operational and discharge data from the Three Gorges Reservoir (TGR), along with water quality parameters from downstream sections, we used Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) to rank the factors contributing to TP concentrations. The analysis identified turbidity, permanganate index (CODMn), total nitrogen (TN), water temperature, chlorophyll a, upstream water level variation, and discharge from the Three Gorges Dam (TGD) as the top contributors. Subsequently, a coupled neural network model was established, incorporating these key contributors, to predict TP concentrations under the dynamic water level control during flood periods in the TGR. The proposed GRA-CEEMDAN-CN1D-LSTM-DBO model was compared with conventional models, including BP, LSTM, and GRU. The results indicated that the GRA-CEEMDAN-CN1D-LSTM-DBO model significantly outperformed the others, achieving a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.784 and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.004, compared to 0.58 (R) and 0.007 (RMSE) for the LSTM model, 0.576 (R) and 0.007 (RMSE) for the BP model, and 0.623 (R) and 0.006 (RMSE) for the GRU model. The model's accuracy and applicability further validated in two sections: YC (Yunchi) in Yichang City and LK (Liukou) in Jingzhou City, where it performed satisfactorily in predicting TP in YC (R = 0.776, RMSE = 0.007) and LK (R = 0.718, RMSE = 0.007). Additionally, deep learning analysis revealed that as the distance away from dam increased, prediction accuracy gradually decreased, indicating a reduced impact of TGR operations on downstream TP concentrations. In conclusion, the GRA-CEEMDAN-CN1D-LSTM-DBO model demonstrates superior performance in predicting TP concentration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River, offering valuable insights for dynamic water level control during flood seasons and contributing of smart to the advancement of water management in the Yangtze River.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.