Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39169080›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Neural mechanisms responsible for vagus nerve stimulation-dependent enhancement of somatosensory recovery.

Kaitlyn M Malley, Andrea D Ruiz, Michael J Darrow, Tanya Danaphongse, Stephanie Shiers, Fatima N Ahmad, Clareth Mota-Beltran, Benjamin T Stanislav, Theodore J Price, Robert L Rennaker and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kaitlyn M MalleyTexas Biomedical Device Center, Richardson, USA.
Andrea D RuizTexas Biomedical Device Center, Richardson, USA.
Michael J DarrowTexas Biomedical Device Center, Richardson, USA.
Tanya DanaphongseTexas Biomedical Device Center, Richardson, USA.
Stephanie ShiersSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Richardson, USA.
Fatima N AhmadTexas Biomedical Device Center, Richardson, USA.
Clareth Mota-BeltranTexas Biomedical Device Center, Richardson, USA.
Benjamin T StanislavTexas Biomedical Device Center, Richardson, USA.
Theodore J PriceSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Richardson, USA.
Robert L RennakerTexas Biomedical Device Center, Richardson, USA.
Michael P KilgardTexas Biomedical Device Center, Richardson, USA.
Seth A HaysTexas Biomedical Device Center, Richardson, USA. seth.hays@utdallas.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4225-241X

Funding

Evaluation of the Neuromodulatory Mechanisms of Vagus Nerve Stimulation to Improve Motor Rehabilitation after StrokeR01NS094384 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI HAYS, SETH ALANSON · 2016 to 2020
$1.7M
NIH HHS NIH R01 NS094384NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS094384U.S. Department of Defense W81XWH-20-1-0863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Impairments in somatosensory function are a common and often debilitating consequence of neurological injury, with few effective interventions. Building on success in rehabilitation for motor dysfunction, the delivery of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) combined with tactile rehabilitation has emerged as a potential approach to enhance recovery of somatosensation. In order to maximize the effectiveness of VNS therapy and promote translation to clinical implementation, we sought to optimize the stimulation paradigm and identify neural mechanisms that underlie VNS-dependent recovery. To do so, we characterized the effect of tactile rehabilitation combined with VNS across a range of stimulation intensities on recovery of somatosensory function in a rat model of chronic sensory loss in the forelimb. Consistent with previous studies in other applications, we find that moderate intensity VNS yields the most effective restoration of somatosensation, and both lower and higher VNS intensities fail to enhance recovery compared to rehabilitation without VNS. We next used the optimized, moderate intensity to evaluate the mechanisms that underlie recovery. We find that moderate intensity VNS enhances transcription of Arc, a canonical mediator of synaptic plasticity, in the cortex, and that transcript levels were correlated with the degree of somatosensory recovery. Moreover, we observe that blocking plasticity by depleting acetylcholine in the cortex prevents the VNS-dependent enhancement of somatosensory recovery. Collectively, these findings identify neural mechanisms that subserve VNS-dependent somatosensation recovery and provide a basis for selecting optimal stimulation parameters in order to facilitate translation of this potential intervention.

Indexed as

Neuronal PlasticityRecovery of FunctionSomatosensory CortexVagus Nerve StimulationAnimalsMaleRatsRats, Sprague-Dawley

Identifiers

PMID39169080
PMCPMC11339300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.