Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39168972›Full record

ArticleLight, science & applications2024

Non-invasive estimation of the powder size distribution from a single speckle image.

Qihang Zhang, Ajinkya Pandit, Zhiguang Liu, Zhen Guo, Shashank Muddu, Yi Wei, Deborah Pereg, Neda Nazemifard, Charles Papageorgiou, Yihui Yang and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Light, science & applications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Qihang ZhangDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5018-8310
Ajinkya PanditDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Zhiguang LiuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Zhen GuoDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1347-3451
Shashank MudduProcess Chemistry Development, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co, 40 Landsdowne St, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Yi WeiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Deborah PeregDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Neda NazemifardProcess Chemistry Development, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co, 40 Landsdowne St, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Charles PapageorgiouProcess Chemistry Development, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co, 40 Landsdowne St, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Yihui YangProcess Chemistry Development, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co, 40 Landsdowne St, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Wenlong TangShinrAI Center for AI/ML, Data Sciences Institutes, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co, 650 E Kendall St, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA.
Richard D BraatzDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Allan S MyersonDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
George BarbastathisSingapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology (SMART) Centre, Singapore, 117543, Singapore. gbarb@mit.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-invasive characterization of powders may take one of two approaches: imaging and counting individual particles; or relying on scattered light to estimate the particle size distribution (PSD) of the ensemble. The former approach runs into practical difficulties, as the system must conform to the working distance and other restrictions of the imaging optics. The latter approach requires an inverse map from the speckle autocorrelation to the particle sizes. The principle relies on the pupil function determining the basic sidelobe shape, whereas the particle size spread modulates the sidelobe intensity. We recently showed that it is feasible to invert the speckle autocorrelation and obtain the PSD using a neural network, trained efficiently through a physics-informed semi-generative approach. In this work, we eliminate one of the most time-consuming steps of our previous method by engineering the pupil function. By judiciously blocking portions of the pupil, we sacrifice some photons but in return we achieve much enhanced sidelobes and, hence, higher sensitivity to the change of the size distribution. The result is a 60 × reduction in total acquisition and processing time, or 0.25 seconds per frame in our implementation. Almost real-time operation in our system is not only more appealing toward rapid industrial adoption, it also paves the way for quantitative characterization of complex spatial or temporal dynamics in drying, blending, and other chemical and pharmaceutical manufacturing processes.

Identifiers

PMID39168972
PMCPMC11339358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.