ArticleClinical and experimental nephrology2025
Children and adolescents with severe motor and intellectual disabilities who underwent kidney transplantation.
Article in Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Overcoming anatomical barriers in pediatric kidney transplantation.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKidney transplantation (KT) in children and adolescents with severe motor and intellectual disabilities (SMID) has been a topic of controversy. A multicenter study in Japan showed that KT was not contraindicated for children with multiple handicaps, but no consensus has been reached on KT for patients with SMID. This study aimed to determine whether KT is a viable treatment option for children and adolescents with SMID.
methodsA single-center, retrospective study was conducted on children and adolescents with SMID who underwent KT. SMID was defined based on Oshima's classification. Clinical information was collected through a review of medical records.
resultsOf 453 children and adolescents who underwent KT between 1983 and 2023 in our institution, six (1.3%) patients with SMID were identified. One patient received KT twice. All patients underwent living KT. Five patients used medical devices, including gastrostomy and a ventriculoperitoneal shunt, prior to KT. Perioperative complications, including hemothorax related to central venous catheter insertion, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and common iliac artery thrombosis requiring graftectomy, occurred in three patients. One patient required vesicostomy owing to refractory urinary tract infection. There was no significant difference in the graft survival rate between patients with SMID and those without SMID. One patient developed graft failure and died after selecting conservative kidney management.
conclusionOur study showed a favorable graft survival in children and adolescents with SMID who underwent KT. Although careful perioperative management and continued medical care are required, KT may be a viable option for these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39168887What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.