ArticleRheumatology international2024
Development and validation of a predictive model for end-stage renal disease in systemic lupus erythematosus patients.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive analysis of predictive models for disease manifestations and case fatality in systemic lupus erythematosus.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Review
- Preoperative donor urinary UDP-Glc as an independent risk factor for delayed graft function.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) affects many populations. This study aims to develop a predictive model and create a nomogram for assessing the risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in patients diagnosed with SLE. Data from electronic health records of SLE patients treated at the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College between 2013 and 2023 were collected. The dataset underwent thorough cleaning and variable assignment procedures. Subsequently, variables were selected using one-way logistic regression and lasso logistic regression methods, followed by multifactorial logistic regression to construct nomograms. The model's performance was assessed using calibration, receiver operating characteristic (ROC), and decision curve analysis (DCA) curves. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. The predictive variables for ESRD development in SLE patients included anti-GP210 antibody presence, urinary occult blood, proteinuria, white blood cell count, complement 4 levels, uric acid, creatinine, total protein, globulin, glomerular filtration rate, pH, specific gravity, very low-density lipoprotein, homocysteine, apolipoprotein B, and absolute counts of cytotoxic T cells. The nomogram exhibited a broad predictive range. The ROC area under the curve (AUC) was 0.886 (0.858-0.913) for the training set and 0.840 (0.783-0.897) for the testing set, indicating good model performance. The model demonstrated both applicability and significant clinical benefits. The developed model presents strong predictive capabilities and considerable clinical utility in estimating the risk of ESRD in patients with SLE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39168871What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.