Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39168837›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2025

Inverse probability weighting to estimate impacts of hypothetical occupational limits on radon exposure to reduce lung cancer.

Alexander P Keil, Yi Li, Qing Lan, Stephen Bertke, Robert D Daniels, Jessie K Edwards, Kaitlin Kelly-Reif

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexander P KeilOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Bethesda, MD 20892, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0955-6107
Yi LiDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3G 1G1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9359-210X
Qing LanOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Bethesda, MD 20892, United States.
Stephen BertkeField Research Branch, Division of Field studies and Engineering, National institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Cincinnati, OH 45226, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3047-3816
Robert D DanielsField Research Branch, Division of Field studies and Engineering, National institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Cincinnati, OH 45226, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3915-7991
Jessie K EdwardsDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1741-335X
Kaitlin Kelly-ReifField Research Branch, Division of Field studies and Engineering, National institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Cincinnati, OH 45226, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6020-2646

Funding

STUDIES OF OCCUPATIONAL CANCER--PESTICIDESZ01CP010119 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI ALAVANJA, MICHAEL · 1996 to 2008
$5.0M
Intramural CDC HHS CC999999Intramural NIH HHS Z01 CP010119Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of HealthNational Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics Z01CP010119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radon is a known cause of lung cancer. Protective standards for radon exposure are derived largely from studies of working populations that are prone to healthy worker survivor bias. This bias can lead to underprotection of workers and is a key barrier to understanding health effects of many exposures. We apply inverse probability weighting to study a set of hypothetical exposure limits among 4137 male, White and American Indian radon-exposed uranium miners in the Colorado Plateau followed from 1950 to 2005. We estimate cumulative risk of lung cancer through age 90 under hypothetical occupational limits. We estimate that earlier implementation of the current US Mining Safety and Health Administration annual standard of 4 working level months (implemented here as a monthly exposure limit) could have reduced lung cancer mortality from 16 of 100 workers to 6 of 100 workers (95% confidence interval, 3/100, 8/100), in contrast with previous estimates of 10 of 100 workers. Our estimate is similar to that among contemporaneous occupational cohorts. Inverse probability weighting is a simple and computationally efficient way address healthy worker survivor bias to contrast health effects of exposure limits and estimate the number of excess health outcomes under exposure limits at work.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsMiningNeoplasms, Radiation-InducedOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureRadonAdultAgedAged, 80 and overColoradoHumansMaleMiddle AgedProbabilityUraniumRadonUraniumcausal inferencehealthy worker survivor biasinverse probability weightinglung canceroccupationalradon

Identifiers

PMID39168837
PMCPMC11973934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.