ArticleHeart rhythm2025
Improved diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy using electrocardiographic deep learning.
Article in Heart rhythm, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.European heart journal · 2026Review
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Electrocardiographic Criteria in Differentiating Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy From Idiopathic Outflow Tract Ventricular Arrhythmia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of arrhythmia · 2026Article
- Machine learning models enhance detection of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.Machine learning. Health · 2026Article
- Machine Learning in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy: Phenotyping, Mechanism Discovery, and Clinical Applications.Cardiology in review · 2026Article
- Leveraging artificial intelligence for risk stratification of inherited cardiomyopathies in under-resourced settings.Heart rhythm O2 · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Models Enhance Prediction of Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Enhancing explainability in clinical deep-learning models: Latent-space variable decoding is superior to gradient-weighted class activation mapping.Heart rhythm O2 · 2025Article
- Family Screening in Relatives at Risk for Plakophilin-2-Associated Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy.Circulation · 2025Article
- Classification of Heart Failure Using Machine Learning: A Comparative Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death: A guide for clinicians.Indian pacing and electrophysiology journalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundArrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is a rare genetic heart disease associated with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Diagnosis of ARVC is based on the 2010 Task Force Criteria (TFC), application of which often requires clinical expertise at specialized centers.
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to develop and validate an electrocardiogram (ECG) deep learning (DL) tool for ARVC diagnosis.
methodsECGs of patients referred for ARVC evaluation were used to develop (n = 551 [80.1%]) and test (n = 137 [19.9%]) an ECG-DL model for prediction of TFC-defined ARVC diagnosis. The ARVC ECG-DL model was externally validated in a cohort of patients with pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) ARVC gene variants identified through the Geisinger MyCode Community Health Initiative (N = 167).
resultsOf 688 patients evaluated at Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) (57.3% male, mean age 40.2 years), 329 (47.8%) were diagnosed with ARVC. Although ARVC diagnosis made by referring cardiologist ECG interpretation was unreliable (c-statistic 0.53; confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.53), ECG-DL discrimination in the hold-out testing cohort was excellent (0.87; 0.86-0.89) and compared favorably to that of ECG interpretation by an ARVC expert (0.85; 0.84-0.86). In the Geisinger cohort, prevalence of ARVC was lower (n = 17 [10.2%]), but ECG-DL-based identification of ARVC phenotype remained reliable (0.80; 0.77-0.83). Discrimination was further increased when ECG-DL predictions were combined with non-ECG-derived TFC in the JHH testing (c-statistic 0.940; 95% CI 0.933-0.948) and Geisinger validation (0.897; 95% CI 0.883-0.912) cohorts.
conclusionECG-DL augments diagnosis of ARVC to the level of an ARVC expert and can differentiate true ARVC diagnosis from phenotype-mimics and at-risk family members/genotype-positive individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.