Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39167783›Full record

Trial reportJMIR mental health2024

Skill Enactment Among University Students Using a Brief Video-Based Mental Health Intervention: Mixed Methods Study Within a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Hayley M Jackson, Philip J Batterham, Alison L Calear, Jeneva L Ohan, Louise M Farrer

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR mental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hayley M JacksonCentre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Acton ACT, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8216-0336
Philip J BatterhamCentre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Acton ACT, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4547-6876
Alison L CalearCentre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Acton ACT, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7028-725X
Jeneva L OhanSchool of Psychological Science, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4801-4239
Louise M FarrerCentre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Acton ACT, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5694-4631

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental health problems are common among university students, yet many students do not seek professional help. Digital mental health interventions can increase students' access to support and have been shown to be effective in preventing and treating mental health problems. However, little is known about the extent to which students implement therapeutic skills from these programs in everyday life (ie, skill enactment) or about the impact of skill enactment on outcomes.

objectiveThis study aims to assess the effects of a low-intensity video-based intervention, Uni Virtual Clinic Lite (UVC-Lite), in improving skill enactment relative to an attention-control program (primary aim) and examine whether skill enactment influences symptoms of depression and anxiety (secondary aim). The study also qualitatively explored participants' experiences of, and motivations for, engaging with the therapeutic techniques.

methodsWe analyzed data from a randomized controlled trial testing the effectiveness of UVC-Lite for symptoms of depression and anxiety among university students with mild to moderate levels of psychological distress. Participants were recruited from universities across Australia and randomly assigned to 6 weeks of self-guided use of UVC-Lite (243/487, 49.9%) or an attention-control program (244/487, 50.1%). Quantitative data on skill enactment, depression, and anxiety were collected through baseline, postintervention, and 3- and 6-month follow-up surveys. Qualitative data were obtained from 29 intervention-group participants through open-ended questions during postintervention surveys (n=17, 59%) and semistructured interviews (n=12, 41%) after the intervention period concluded.

resultsMixed model repeated measures ANOVA demonstrated that the intervention did not significantly improve skill enactment (F

conclusionsThe intervention did not improve skill enactment or mental health among students with mild to moderate psychological distress. Low adherence impacted our ability to draw robust conclusions regarding the intervention's impact on outcomes. Factors influencing skill enactment differed across individuals, suggesting that it may be necessary to tailor therapeutic skills and engagement strategies to the individual user. Theoretically informed research involving collaboration with end users is needed to understand the processes underlying skill enactment in digital mental health interventions.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12621000375853; https://tinyurl.com/7b9ar54r.

Indexed as

AnxietyDepressionStudentsAdolescentAdultAustraliaCoping SkillsFemaleHumansMaleUniversitiesVideo RecordingYoung Adultanxietycomputer-assisted therapydepressionengagementinternetmobile phonerandomized controlled trialskill enactmentuniversity studentsyoung people

Identifiers

PMID39167783
PMCPMC11375386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.