Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39167782›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2024

Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Data Preprocessing Techniques for Detecting, Predicting, and Monitoring Stress and Stress-Related Mental Disorders: Scoping Review.

Moein Razavi, Samira Ziyadidegan, Ahmadreza Mahmoudzadeh, Saber Kazeminasab, Elaheh Baharlouei, Vahid Janfaza, Reza Jahromi, Farzan Sasangohar

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Moein RazaviDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8036-1353
Samira ZiyadideganDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3113-8208
Ahmadreza MahmoudzadehZachry Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5792-6371
Saber KazeminasabHarvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7238-4942
Elaheh BaharloueiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID 0009-0006-3458-3226
Vahid JanfazaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8656-4848
Reza JahromiDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9175-1234
Farzan SasangoharDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9962-5470

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental stress and its consequent mental health disorders (MDs) constitute a significant public health issue. With the advent of machine learning (ML), there is potential to harness computational techniques for better understanding and addressing mental stress and MDs. This comprehensive review seeks to elucidate the current ML methodologies used in this domain to pave the way for enhanced detection, prediction, and analysis of mental stress and its subsequent MDs.

objectiveThis review aims to investigate the scope of ML methodologies used in the detection, prediction, and analysis of mental stress and its consequent MDs.

methodsUsing a rigorous scoping review process with PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines, this investigation delves into the latest ML algorithms, preprocessing techniques, and data types used in the context of stress and stress-related MDs.

resultsA total of 98 peer-reviewed publications were examined for this review. The findings highlight that support vector machine, neural network, and random forest models consistently exhibited superior accuracy and robustness among all ML algorithms examined. Physiological parameters such as heart rate measurements and skin response are prevalently used as stress predictors due to their rich explanatory information concerning stress and stress-related MDs, as well as the relative ease of data acquisition. The application of dimensionality reduction techniques, including mappings, feature selection, filtering, and noise reduction, is frequently observed as a crucial step preceding the training of ML algorithms.

conclusionsThe synthesis of this review identified significant research gaps and outlines future directions for the field. These encompass areas such as model interpretability, model personalization, the incorporation of naturalistic settings, and real-time processing capabilities for the detection and prediction of stress and stress-related MDs.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMachine LearningMental DisordersStress, PsychologicalHumansdata preprocessingdeep learningmachine learningmental disordersstress detectionstress monitoringstress prediction

Identifiers

PMID39167782
PMCPMC11375388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.