Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39167746›Full record

ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2024

Automated Extraction of Patient-Centered Outcomes After Breast Cancer Treatment: An Open-Source Large Language Model-Based Toolkit.

Man Luo, Shubham Trivedi, Allison W Kurian, Kevin Ward, Theresa H M Keegan, Daniel Rubin, Imon Banerjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. From Conversation to Standardized Terminology: An LLM-RAG Approach for Automated Health Problem Identification in Home Healthcare.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2025
    Article
  4. Assessing the accuracy of the GPT-4 model in multidisciplinary tumor board decision prediction.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Man LuoDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ.ORCID 0009-0001-0067-2283
Shubham TrivediDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ.
Allison W KurianDepartments of Medicine and of Epidemiology & Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-6175-9470
Kevin WardDepartment of Internal Medicine, UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA.ORCID 0000-0001-5893-6192
Theresa H M KeeganDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Radiology, and Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-1961-4008
Daniel RubinRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.ORCID 0000-0001-5057-4369
Imon BanerjeeDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ.ORCID 0000-0002-3327-8004

Funding

Translational Oncology Research Program (Project-005)P30CA124435 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Vittorio Sebastiano · 2007 to 2026
$71.4M
Flexible NLP toolkit for automatic curation of outcomes for breast cancer patientsU01CA269264 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA · PI Imon Banerjee, Theresa H M Keegan · 2022 to 2026
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA124435NCI NIH HHS U01 CA269264
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatient-centered outcomes (PCOs) are pivotal in cancer treatment, as they directly reflect patients' quality of life. Although multiple studies suggest that factors affecting breast cancer-related morbidity and survival are influenced by treatment side effects and adherence to long-term treatment, such data are generally only available on a smaller scale or from a single center. The primary challenge with collecting these data is that the outcomes are captured as free text in clinical narratives written by clinicians. MATERIALS AND

methodsGiven the complexity of PCO documentation in these narratives, computerized methods are necessary to unlock the wealth of information buried in unstructured text notes that often document PCOs. Inspired by the success of large language models (LLMs), we examined the adaptability of three LLMs, GPT-2, BioGPT, and PMC-LLaMA, on PCO tasks across three institutions, Mayo Clinic, Emory University Hospital, and Stanford University. We developed an open-source framework for fine-tuning LLM that can directly extract the five different categories of PCO from the clinic notes.

resultsWe found that these LLMs without fine-tuning (zero-shot) struggle with challenging PCO extraction tasks, displaying almost random performance, even with some task-specific examples (few-shot learning). The performance of our fine-tuned, task-specific models is notably superior compared with their non-fine-tuned LLM models. Moreover, the fine-tuned GPT-2 model has demonstrated a significantly better performance than the other two larger LLMs.

conclusionOur discovery indicates that although LLMs serve as effective general-purpose models for tasks across various domains, they require fine-tuning when applied to the clinician domain. Our proposed approach has the potential to lead more efficient, adaptable models for PCO information extraction, reducing reliance on extensive computational resources while still delivering superior performance for specific tasks.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNatural Language ProcessingElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansPatient-Centered CarePatient Outcome AssessmentQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID39167746
PMCPMC11867221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.