Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39167661›Full record

ArticleScience advances2024

Nuclear deformation and dynamics of migrating cells in 3D confinement reveal adaptation of pulling and pushing forces.

Stefan Stöberl, Johannes Flommersfeld, Maximilian M Kreft, Martin Benoit, Chase P Broedersz, Joachim O Rädler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Cyclic stretch inhibits cell invasion in 3D scaffolds.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stefan StöberlFaculty of Physics and Center for NanoScience, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1, D-80539 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5256-5033
Johannes FlommersfeldArnold Sommerfeld Center for Theoretical Physics and Center for NanoScience, Department of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Theresienstraße 37, D-80333 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0715-9503
Maximilian M KreftFaculty of Physics and Center for NanoScience, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1, D-80539 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0009-0005-4981-3859
Martin BenoitFaculty of Physics and Center for NanoScience, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1, D-80539 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1017-8286
Chase P BroederszArnold Sommerfeld Center for Theoretical Physics and Center for NanoScience, Department of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Theresienstraße 37, D-80333 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7283-3704
Joachim O RädlerFaculty of Physics and Center for NanoScience, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1, D-80539 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5846-1489

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eukaryotic cells show an astounding ability to remodel their shape and cytoskeleton and to migrate through pores and constrictions smaller than their nuclear diameter. However, the relation of nuclear deformation and migration dynamics in confinement remains unclear. Here, we study the mechanics and dynamics of mesenchymal cancer cell nuclei transitioning through three-dimensional compliant hydrogel channels. We find a biphasic dependence of migration speed and transition frequency on channel width, peaking at widths comparable to the nuclear diameter. Using confocal imaging and hydrogel bead displacement, we determine nuclear deformations and corresponding forces during confined migration. The nucleus deforms reversibly with a reduction in volume during confinement. With decreasing channel width, the nuclear shape during transmigration changes biphasically, concomitant with the transitioning dynamics. Our proposed physical model explains the observed nuclear shapes and transitioning dynamics in terms of the cytoskeletal force generation adapting from purely pulling-based to a combined pulling- and pushing-based mechanism with increasing nuclear confinement.

Indexed as

Cell MovementCell NucleusBiomechanical PhenomenaCell Line, TumorCytoskeletonHumansHydrogelsHydrogels

Identifiers

PMID39167661
PMCPMC11338266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.