Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39167651›Full record

ArticleScience advances2024

Global expansion of human-wildlife overlap in the 21st century.

Deqiang Ma, Briana Abrahms, Jacob Allgeier, Tim Newbold, Brian C Weeks, Neil H Carter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Understanding mammal avoidance of human settlements.The Journal of animal ecology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Seal finger: a literature review.International journal of circumpolar health · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Deqiang MaInstitute for Global Change Biology, School for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8938-1668
Briana AbrahmsDepartment of Biology, Center for Ecosystem Sentinels, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1987-5045
Jacob AllgeierDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9005-6432
Tim NewboldCentre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7361-0051
Brian C WeeksInstitute for Global Change Biology, School for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2967-2970
Neil H CarterInstitute for Global Change Biology, School for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4399-6384

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the extent to which people and wildlife overlap in space and time is critical for the conservation of biodiversity and ecological services. Yet, how global change will reshape the future of human-wildlife overlap has not been assessed. We show that the potential spatial overlap of global human populations and 22,374 terrestrial vertebrate species will increase across ~56.6% and decrease across only ~11.8% of the Earth's terrestrial surface by 2070. Increases are driven primarily by intensification of human population densities, not change in wildlife distributions caused by climate change. The strong spatial heterogeneity of future human-wildlife overlap found in our study makes it clear that local context is imperative to consider, and more targeted area-based land-use planning should be integrated into systematic conservation planning.

Indexed as

Animals, WildClimate ChangeConservation of Natural ResourcesAnimalsBiodiversityEcosystemHumansPopulation DensityPopulation Dynamics

Identifiers

PMID39167651
PMCPMC11338222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.