Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39167648›Full record

ArticleScience advances2024

Large-enhancement nanoscale dynamic nuclear polarization near a silicon nanowire surface.

Sahand Tabatabaei, Pritam Priyadarsi, Namanish Singh, Pardis Sahafi, Daniel Tay, Andrew Jordan, Raffi Budakian

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sahand TabatabaeiDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L3G1.ORCID 0000-0002-4231-7968
Pritam PriyadarsiDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L3G1.ORCID 0000-0002-1425-3856
Namanish SinghDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L3G1.ORCID 0000-0002-0890-1108
Pardis SahafiDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L3G1.ORCID 0000-0002-5672-7108
Daniel TayDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L3G1.ORCID 0000-0001-8076-0592
Andrew JordanDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L3G1.
Raffi BudakianDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L3G1.ORCID 0000-0002-1050-1461

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) has revolutionized the field of nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, expanding its reach and capabilities to investigate diverse materials, biomolecules, and complex dynamic processes. Bringing high-efficiency DNP to the nanometer scale would open exciting avenues for studying nanoscale nuclear spin ensembles, such as single biomolecules, virus particles, and condensed matter systems. Combining pulsed DNP with nanoscale force-detected magnetic resonance measurements, we demonstrated a 100-fold enhancement in the Boltzmann polarization of proton spins in nanoscale sugar droplets at 6 kelvin and 0.33 tesla. Crucially, this enhancement corresponds to a factor of 200 reduction in the averaging time compared to measurements that rely on the detection of statistical fluctuations in nanoscale nuclear spin ensembles. These results substantially advance the capabilities of force-detected magnetic resonance detection as a practical tool for nanoscale imaging.

Identifiers

PMID39167648
PMCPMC11338224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.